Writing & Evaluating Narrative CVs
Outputs from Flexible Fund project from Fabio Fasoli et al on “Breaking barriers in research funding applications: Evaluating narrative CVs and co-designing solutions for application processes”.
Published : 18/08/2025
Home » Writing and Evaluating Narrative CVs
This project received funding from EDICa’s Flexible Fund Round 2. The project aimed to investigate challenges and opportunities encountered by underrepresented individuals during the funding application preparation process, particularly focusing on Narrative CVs. Unlike traditional academic CVs, narrative CVs use a narrative approach to highlight the applicants’ achievements and strengths, aiming to reduce evaluation biases.
Led by Dr Fabio Fasoli from the University of Surrey, with co-investigators Dr Hannah Frith, Dr Noelia Noël, and Dr Susan Hutton of University of Surrey, with partners DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment) Group and the Institute for Sustainability at University of Surrey.
Below you can find a series of outputs of different kinds.
Infographic showing key results
Report: Working Together for Effective Narrative CVs – Insights, Challenges, and Next Steps
This report describes the outcomes of a co-production workshop focused on inclusive training and guidance for writing narrative CVs, and includes a set of recommendations.
Report: Writing and Evaluating Narrative CVs – Breaking Barriers in Research Funding Applications
This report presents a study that analyses the language used by researchers in narrative CVs and examines how specific linguistic features influence reviewers’ evaluations.
Concept Map: Barriers and Facilitators Concerning the Application Process
The project team conducted semi-structured interviews to identify the obstacles for 20 underrepresented researchers. The data informed the development of a concept map illustrating the barriers and facilitators when preparing grant applications among underrepresented researchers, along with a glossary explaining each of these factors. Although distinct, self-related and external barriers interacted to exacerbate the difficulties faced by researchers from marginalised groups.
Concept Map: Barriers and Facilitators to Adopting Narrative CVs by Underrepresented Researchers
The project team conducted semi-structured interviews to identify the obstacles for 20 underrepresented researchers. The data informed the development of a concept map illustrating the barriers and facilitators to adopting Narrative CVs among underrepresented researchers, along with a glossary explaining each of these factors.
Blog: How do researchers write Narrative CVs? Does language matter?
“Do underrepresented researchers write narrative CVs differently? And which features of their language influence how these CVs are judged?” Click on the button below to read this two page blog, published 19 August 2025.
Other resources
EDICa hosts a regular blog and seminars, as well as collecting a library of resources of equality, diversity & inclusion practices in research & innovation.

Report on recommendations for improving support for managing menstrual health
Date: 10th June 2024
Report
Report on “Recommendations for improving support for researchers
managing menstrual health”

Disabled people are missing from Antarctic EDI work: how do we fix it?
Date: 23 May 2024
A guest blog by Alice Oates, a 2023 Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) Fellow.

EDI Tools: Top down or bottom up?
Date: 21st December 2023
A summary of our seminar showcasing two EDI tools – the D&I Progression Framework, and the EDI Cube.
