Good Practice Guide on the Research Funding Process
EDICa’s recommendations for good practice on the reach and support of a diverse range of applicants; the peer review process; providing feedback; and conducting inclusive peer review.
Published : 24/06/2026
Home » Good Practice Guide on the Research Funding Process
EDICa’s Workstream 2 set out to determine how EDI (equality/equity, diversity and inclusion) can be embedded in the research process and impact those career-defining decisions, like funding and publications. What works, in what context, and why?
“This guide is a living document that seeks to highlight barriers to equitable funding outcomes and various approaches of good practices to overcome these. Research funding is allocated in many different ways and this guide suggests a range of practices which are based on EDICa’s evidence-based research. These practices are drawn together into a single resource and not all of the practices presented here will be relevant to, or feasible in, every circumstance. We would be delighted to hear examples of initiatives that you have in place and which tackle the barriers discussed in this guide.” edicaucus@hw.ac.uk
Stages of the Research Process
Other resources
EDICa has a library of resources of equality, diversity & inclusion practices in research & innovation.
Comic- Peer Review Panels
Date: 25th May 2026 –
A two-page comic depicting a peer review panel discussing merits of applicants from research-intensive and modern universities.

Report on peer review bias in the funding process
Date: 4th April 2024
Evidence review on peer review bias in the funding process.

Interventions Seminar – Recording
Date: 22nd May 2024
In May EDICa hosted a panel of funder representatives and researchers to discuss alternative methods of assessing funding applications. Access the recording here.