Service dogs in laboratories
Meet Sampson the Science Service Dog, who was trained to support a researcher with medical needs to complete her neuroscience degree, then campaigned to change US Federal guidelines.
Published : 18/03/2026
Home » Service dogs in laboratories
In 2006, Joey Ramp-Adams in Arizona, USA, suffered a traumatic brain injury, broken bones, and permanent nerve damage. As a result, she required the aid of a service dog to help her navigate life.
She embarked on a neuroscience degree at the University of Illinois, but faced difficulty in being able to do labwork without her service dog. Working with the university and then spending 9 months training Sampson, her Golden Retriever service dog, she was able to carry out tasks in the lab following individualised risk assessments.

“He had to learn to differentiate to pick up stuff off the ground but not in the lab. Medical alert movements also needed to be learned. But the biggest adjustment was learning to discern between outside commands vs. lab-related commands.” (https://thetucsondog.com/arizonas-sampson-the-science-service-dog-becomes-sampson-the-hero-dog-winner/ )
Joey and Sampson came up against the USA Centre for Disease Control’s guidance: “Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL)” . This had a sentence that said “Animals and plants not associated with the work being performed are not permitted in the laboratory.” This statement was being interpreted in such a way that no animal ever was allowed. Joey and Sampson spent more than 2 years campaigning to have this wording clarified to allow risk-assessed service dogs in labs.
In March 2026, the CDC issued clarification. We’ll let Joey explain in her own words, from her LinkedIn post trumpeting the new guidance:
“CDC has issued a formal clarification:
“Clarification on Service Animals in Laboratories: Compliance with Federal Laws and BMBL Guidance.”
And it says what should have always been clear:
• The BMBL does not override federal, state, or local law
• It cannot be used to deny reasonable accommodations
• It is guidance—not regulatory authority
• Risk assessment—not blanket exclusion—must drive decisions
Most importantly, service animals must be considered within the framework of lawful accommodation and individualized risk assessment. This is more than a clarification. It is the first time this has been explicitly stated in alignment with biosafety guidance at the federal level. This is precedent setting. It closes a policy gap that has harmed careers, limited access, and forced talented scientists out of the field.
To every Environmental Health & Safety office, compliance leader, biosafety professional, and institution: Please read this. Share this. Implement this. Because inclusion and biosafety are not in conflict—they were just never clearly aligned. Until now.”
Read the CDC one-page document here.
As a postscript, Sampson is now retired, and can be found sunning himself and getting lots of love and pets from Joey (or Mom as she’s known by Sampson on social media), while his successor, a black labrador named Pax, does the hard work of keeping Joey safe. Sampson (and Joey) can be found on Facebook, Twitter/X, and Instagram.
American Humane Society’s half-hour showcase of Joey Ramp-Adams and Sampson the Science Service Dog.
Other resources
EDICa hosts a regular blog and seminars, as well as collecting a library of resources of equality, diversity & inclusion practices in research & innovation.
Reasonable Adjustments
Date: 1 October 2018 –
Produced by the Association of Graduate Careers Advisory Services, a practical list of potential reasonable adjustments for various neurodivergent requirements.
Disability Access in Laboratory Environments
Date: 1 March 2026 –
Outputs from Flexible Fund project including the final report, protocol, Structural Access Assessment and Equipment Access Assessment.

Disabled people are missing from Antarctic EDI work: how do we fix it?
Date: 23 May 2024
A guest blog by Alice Oates, a 2023 Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) Fellow.