Disability Access in Laboratory Environments
Outputs from Flexible Fund project led by Dr Katherine Deane, including the final report, protocol, Structural Access Assessment and the Equipment Access Assessment.
Published : 01/03/2026
Home » Disability Access in Laboratory Environments
DALE Reports
1. Executive Summary
Disability access in labs is generally poor due to a historic assumption that disabled scientists could not be accommodated safely in such environments. However, improving this state is complex and detailed. It also requires a common language and criteria in order for everyone to understand what an “accessible” lab really looks like. The Disability Assessment in Laboratory Environments (DALE) project aimed to address the challenge of creating a generic assessment of lab disability access for a wide range of lab types. We also examined the impact on disabled staff and students of laboratories designed to a highly accessible standard after 6 years of use.
1.1 Work package 1: Review of disability access records and processes in shared resource laboratories.
The four universities were able to provide policies and processes for implementing disability accommodations and ensuring safety. However, we were unable to gain access to specific anonymised examples of these documents due to uncertainty about where these documents were stored and concerns about confidentiality.
1.2 Work package 2: Assessment of the disability access of shared resource laboratories.
The DALE team created three iterations of the access assessment. This resulted in electronic assessments for structures and equipment access, informed by UEA’s access guidelines and numerous perspectives and tested in four different institutions and in labs with multiple purposes. We believe this is a solid starting point for a sufficiently generic access assessment relevant to a wide range of lab types.
1.3 Work package 3: Interviews with staff and students on the experiences of the accessibility of shared resource laboratories.
We conducted seven semi-structured interviews with people with an interest in or experience of disability access exploring their experience of the shared resource facilities in the context of disability access, positive and negative experiences, impact on inclusion, lab culture, workload, accidents and near misses etc. The interviews also examined the experiences of six years of use of UEA’s highly accessible New Science and Productivity East the design of which were informed by UEA’s access guidelines.
These interviews highlighted a number of themes. The lab staff found the process of completing the access assessment was an intervention in itself, raising awareness of disability accommodation needs, deficits in processes (e.g. lack of Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans for temporary disabilities), and promoted a different way of thinking about the design of the labs and future equipment purchases. However, the system was recognised as fragile with limited training and key access advocates feeling unsupported and at risk of burn out. The interviews also highlighted the systemic and interconnected character of disability access. Design flaws, e.g. a lack of signs naming a building, could cause students to get lost and waste energy travelling to the wrong building, this problem is compounded for disabled students by the building’s location at the bottom of a hill. Positive design features e.g. the provision of sound baffles that reduce noise transmission and so aid ease of conversations, and this benefit is compounded for some neurodiverse students who now use the space preferentially for studying.
The interviewees agreed that UEA’s access guidelines were mostly correct, improved access, and were easy to maintain. Suggestions were made for minor improvements which have been incorporated into the guidelines and assessments. There were significant wash over benefits of the design that positively impacted everyone that used the labs. The accessible environment was even perceived as having an impacted on culture. “It does actually embolden people. It feels like it is literal, inclusive practise in action. And I think we are increasingly seeing students who are happier to talk about their additional needs. And as a cohort I think they are very supportive of each other in terms of people that might not look like them”
1.4 Discussion
This project has validated the utility and positive impact of the UEA access guidelines regarding the design of labs. We believe this is some of the first evidence of the long term (6 years) impact of such guidelines in practice in technical spaces such as laboratories. The access guidelines were the core to the design of the access assessments which were then refined with advice from multiple perspectives. The access assessments have been created for structures and equipment in laboratory environments and tested in four institutions across labs for multiple subjects and purposes. We are therefore confident that the access assessments are robust and generic enough to be used in a wide variety of laboratory settings. We believe these assessments will allow benchmarking of accessibility across and between institutions. We believe even conducting the assessment can raise awareness of disability needs and promote improved purchasing decisions and safety protocols.
The project has highlighted the challenge of assessing the less tangible aspects of disability access e.g. reasonable accommodations, safety adaptations, training, and the interconnectedness of accessibility. Future work is needed to create useful ways to identify and assess good and poor practice in these areas.
1.5 Dissemination plans
The DALE project has had substantial interest from a wide range of universities, research institutions, funders, and learned societies. The team expect to be able to publish a couple of peer-reviewed papers on the development of the assessments and the evaluation of the utility of access design advice after six years of use. The DALE Structural Access Assessment and the DALE Equipment Access Assessment can be found . The team have already delivered a number of talks and workshops implementing the lessons learned from this project into cohesive advice on how to make research environments more accessible with a view to enhancing the inclusivity and accessibility of research overall. There are plans to continue to present this work at conferences, seminars, and workshops. The team have been invited to provide advice to EPSRC on their ongoing agenda to improve the accessibility of national shared facilities and grant application processes. We hope to work with a number of learned societies in order to get these assessments adopted and promoted for use with their memberships.
Click here to view and download the DALE Structural Access Assessment
The purpose of this Access Assessment
“This access assessment focuses on assessing the key structural accessibility considerations of laboratory spaces. However, as those working in laboratory spaces also need offices, meeting rooms, break rooms, toilets and showers, etc. key accessibility issues for the building in general will also be described in brief. It covers the lab structure, fixed furniture and fittings (hoods, benches etc) and chairs.”
Click here to view and download the DALE Equipment Access Assessment
Purpose of this Access Assessment
“This access assessment focuses on assessing equipment in use in laboratory spaces. The equipment is not fixed in place. Please see the structural access assessment for lab structure, fixed furniture and fittings (hoods, benches etc) and chairs.”
Click here to view and download the DALE Protocol
This Protocol document contains a wealth of information about how the DALE project was carried out, including the research design, co-design, how participants were recruited and supported, how consent was gathered, how records of research data were handled, and more.
The document could be a useful tool for early career researchers or students on how to carry out this type of inclusive research.

Abstract
The use of English as the common language of science represents a major impediment to maximising the contribution of non-native English speakers to science. Yet few studies have quantified the consequences of language barriers on the career development of researchers who are non-native English speakers. By surveying 908 researchers in environmental sciences, this study estimates and compares the amount of effort required to conduct scientific activities in English between researchers from different countries and, thus, different linguistic and economic backgrounds. Our survey demonstrates that non-native English speakers, especially early in their careers, spend more effort than native English speakers in conducting scientific activities, from reading and writing papers and preparing presentations in English, to disseminating research in multiple languages. Language barriers can also cause them not to attend, or give oral presentations at, international conferences conducted in English. We urge scientific communities to recognise and tackle these disadvantages to release the untapped potential of non-native English speakers in science. This study also proposes potential solutions that can be implemented today by individuals, institutions, journals, funders, and conferences.
Take action

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184.g006
The authors argue that immediate action should be taken to address many of the points they raise. “A key aspect of those solutions is to embrace linguistic diversity in science and encourage the multilingualization of science and its communication, as this can help to improve equity, diversity, and inclusiveness in science.” Emerging artificial intelligence tools are expected to help (the article was in development in late 2022), however there’s still much that can be done? The authors have produced a table, which can be conveniently downloaded as a PPT (for PowerPoints), PNG or TIFF. It lists what supervisors/collaborators, institutions, journals, funders and conferences can do regarding paper reading, paper writing/publication, dissemination, and conference participation.
Other resources
EDICa hosts a regular blog and seminars, as well as collecting a library of resources of equality, diversity & inclusion practices in research & innovation.

Report on recommendations for improving support for managing menstrual health
Date: 10th June 2024
Report
Report on “Recommendations for improving support for researchers
managing menstrual health”

Disabled people are missing from Antarctic EDI work: how do we fix it?
Date: 23 May 2024
A guest blog by Alice Oates, a 2023 Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) Fellow.

EDI Tools: Top down or bottom up?
Date: 21st December 2023
A summary of our seminar showcasing two EDI tools – the D&I Progression Framework, and the EDI Cube.