Supporting LGBTQ+ Research Impact & Public Engagement
EDICa Flexible Fund outputs on how to support researchers working in LGBTQ+ research dealing with public harassment. A project toolkit offers flexible training resources and activities supporting both academic and professional services staff.
Published : 22/06/2026
Home » All visibility good visibility?
Please feel free to share these resources with colleagues and networks who may be interested. If you make use of the report or toolkit, the project team would be grateful if you could complete the short form available on the project webpage.
Supporting LGBTQ+ researchers
The growing expectations for academics to be publicly visible through research impact and engagement are reshaping research cultures, with particular consequences on researchers working on LGBTQ+ topics, many of whom may identify as LGBTQ+ themselves. Academics want to promote their research outside of the university, collaborate with external organisations and individuals, and realise the potential of their research to make a difference. However, in an increasingly queer- and transphobic public environment, this is becoming more difficult and more risky for researchers working on LGBTQ+ topics.
The project explored how harassment, or the threat of it, affects researchers working on LGBTQ+ topics. It also examined the experiences of professional services staff who support academics, and assessed existing policy and procedural documentation. To do this, we held four focus groups with 19 academics, interviewed 14 professional services staff, and conducted a review of relevant policies. By mapping the current landscape of LGBTQ+ research-related abuse, we hoped to develop strategies for mitigating risk and supporting researchers, and identify examples of good practice. Through working with participants and forming new collaborations, the project also aimed to build a community of people with a shared interest in combatting professional isolation and improving the environment in which research impact takes place.
Resources produced to support LGBTQ+ researchers
This is a research project led by Tig Slater, Sheffield Hallam University, Charlotte Jones, Swansea University, Rosie Ola-Marie, University of Bristol, and Amy Ryall, Royal Central School of Speech and Drama.
The team have produced a 4-minute introductory video (below), a 35-page illustrated report, and a 32-page illustrated toolkit with vignettes that you can either read within the PDF or watch on YouTube. These creatively animated videos are 1:30 long and feature the stories of an LGBTQ+ Phd student; an impact officer supporting LGTBQ+ researchers create impact case studies, and a senior LGBTQ+ academic. In the toolkit, each vignette has facilitator questions to spark dialogue and reflection.
Introduction film: a toolkit for supporting LGBTQ+ Research Impact and Public Engagement
A short 4-minute introduction on the project and resulting toolkit?
Graphic showing barriers

Visit the article to view and download this useful graphic depicting the extra hurdles facing the non-native English speaker (the yellow figure).
Abstract
The use of English as the common language of science represents a major impediment to maximising the contribution of non-native English speakers to science. Yet few studies have quantified the consequences of language barriers on the career development of researchers who are non-native English speakers. By surveying 908 researchers in environmental sciences, this study estimates and compares the amount of effort required to conduct scientific activities in English between researchers from different countries and, thus, different linguistic and economic backgrounds. Our survey demonstrates that non-native English speakers, especially early in their careers, spend more effort than native English speakers in conducting scientific activities, from reading and writing papers and preparing presentations in English, to disseminating research in multiple languages. Language barriers can also cause them not to attend, or give oral presentations at, international conferences conducted in English. We urge scientific communities to recognise and tackle these disadvantages to release the untapped potential of non-native English speakers in science. This study also proposes potential solutions that can be implemented today by individuals, institutions, journals, funders, and conferences.
Take action

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184.g006
The authors argue that immediate action should be taken to address many of the points they raise. “A key aspect of those solutions is to embrace linguistic diversity in science and encourage the multilingualization of science and its communication, as this can help to improve equity, diversity, and inclusiveness in science.” Emerging artificial intelligence tools are expected to help (the article was in development in late 2022), however there’s still much that can be done? The authors have produced a table, which can be conveniently downloaded as a PPT (for PowerPoints), PNG or TIFF. It lists what supervisors/collaborators, institutions, journals, funders and conferences can do regarding paper reading, paper writing/publication, dissemination, and conference participation.
Other resources
EDICa hosts a regular blog and seminars, as well as collecting a library of resources of equality, diversity & inclusion practices in research & innovation.

Report on recommendations for improving support for managing menstrual health
Date: 10th June 2024
Report
Report on “Recommendations for improving support for researchers
managing menstrual health”

Disabled people are missing from Antarctic EDI work: how do we fix it?
Date: 23 May 2024
A guest blog by Alice Oates, a 2023 Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) Fellow.

EDI Tools: Top down or bottom up?
Date: 21st December 2023
A summary of our seminar showcasing two EDI tools – the D&I Progression Framework, and the EDI Cube.